Title: AI in the Legal Realm: Navigating Challenges and Possibilities by Dr Kiran Kakade

Source:- https://www.ourworld.co

In a world where technology is rapidly evolving, artificial intelligence (AI) has taken center stage, reshaping industries across the spectrum. One fascinating aspect of AI’s impact is its application in law through technologies like ChatGPT and Google Bard. These generative AI tools are simplifying tasks for millions, yet the growth of AI has not gone unnoticed by governments worldwide, who are raising concerns about its potential misuse. Even within the judicial system, renowned for its human judgment, skepticism about AI’s role is palpable. A recent instance from a Delhi High Court case underscores this as a judge questioned whether responses from AI chatbots like ChatGPT should serve as a basis for legal decisions.

Picture this: AI, the technology behind your predictive text and voice assistants, is stepping onto the legal stage. Chatbots, like the famous ChatGPT, can answer questions, generate text, and aid lawyers and legal professionals. However, as AI’s reach expands, so do worries about its responsible usage. Governments are contemplating how to harness AI’s benefits without stumbling into potential pitfalls, particularly when it comes to legal matters.

Now, let’s delve into the recent incident that has captured attention. Two shoemakers were embroiled in a dispute over design theft. One accused the other of copying their unique shoe design. To shed light on the matter, they enlisted the help of ChatGPT, an AI chatbot. They asked it, “Is this company known for their spiky men’s shoes?” The chatbot replied, “Yes!” But things got complicated. The chatbot’s other responses didn’t align with what people were saying. It seemed like the robot was a bit confused.

This brings us to the heart of the issue—the statement made by the Delhi High Court judge. The judge highlighted the uncertainties surrounding AI-generated data. Despite AI’s rapid progress, it hasn’t yet reached a stage where it can replace human intelligence and the empathy that’s crucial in legal decision-making. The judge emphasized that AI, at best, could be used for initial research or to gain a preliminary understanding. However, it shouldn’t form the foundation for critical legal determinations.

But what about the case with the shoes? The court ruled in favor of the shoe-designer who claimed their design was copied. They proved that the other company was trying to deceive people by pretending their shoes were someone else’s.

In the grand scheme of things, AI’s presence in law offers both promise and challenges. AI tools like ChatGPT can be valuable aids in legal research and understanding, but they’re not ready to replace the intricate reasoning of human minds. They might assist lawyers in the early stages of a case, but human judgment and ethics remain irreplaceable.

In conclusion, AI’s integration into law is a journey filled with potential and complexity. It’s like having a helpful companion who guides you on a journey, but ultimately, you’re the one making the decisions. As AI’s role in the legal world evolves, it’s essential to strike a balance between its capabilities and the wisdom of human experience.

Author Details:                                   Dr. Kiran S. Kakade                    (Ph.D., MBA(HR), LL.M., MCA)  Associate Professor (HR),LLIM , Mumbai University http://www.drkirankakade.com